|
Where am I?
|
Indicator: Pest PlantsDownload complete results here ( SummaryPest plants remain a significant problem throughout much of the ACT, impacting on biodiversity values (especially in lowland areas), and affecting rural productivity and plantation forestry. It is not possible to determine an overall trend but to note significant achievements, such as pest willow removal, woody weed control (including weeds of horticultural origin), and preventing establishment of pest water-plants. However, some species remain widespread pests (Blackberry, St John’s Wort), and continue to invade new areas (Chilean Needle Grass, African Love Grass). Weed proliferation following the extensive bushfires of January 2003 is of major concern to land managers. There is a coordinated approach to weed control by government agencies in the ACT through the Weeds Working Group and major control programs have been undertaken in the reporting period. Over this period, expenditure on weed management in the ACT by federal and ACT government agencies has totalled $4.34 million. What the results tell us about the ACTPest plants (weeds) are a major problem throughout much of the ACT and region reflecting an Australia-wide situation in which the condition, with regard to invasive species, is assessed as deteriorating (Australian State of the Environment Committee 2001). Since the first ACT State of the Environment Report in 1994 discussed the problem, a wide range of weed control activity has been undertaken. Some species have been successfully targeted, while others have emerged as new threats. Weeds spread after bushfiresThe spread of weeds in the areas of the ACT burnt in the bushfires of 2001 (3411 hectares) and 2003 (164,914 hectares) is a major concern for land managers and community groups. Following the January 2003 fires, the ACT Weeds Working Group identified the need for extra funding and early control of weeds, such as Paterson’s Curse (Echium plantagineum) and Nodding Thistle (Carduus nutans), expected to flourish in the absence of competition in burned, graded and drought affected areas. Early intervention is expected to be the best way to reduce the weed control burden in the future. However, some species, such as Blackberry, that are showing widespread recovery can only be treated with herbicide when sufficient foliage has appeared. As this can take a year or more for many species, a post-fire weed control program is expected to be needed for a number of years. Costs of weed controlIn 2000–01, expenditure on weed management by ACT and federal government agencies in the ACT totalled $1.59 million, with willows ($0.42 million) and woody weeds ($0.42 million) being the main targets. In 2001–02, expenditure was $1.82 million, targeting willows ($0.47 million), woody weeds ($0.37 million) and ‘other weeds’ ($0.37 million). In 2002–03, drought conditions affected our ability to carry out herbicide-based weed control, and expenditure fell to $0.93 million, with ‘other weeds’ (including pine wildings) ($0.19 million) and Serrated Tussock ($0.17 million) being the main targets. Community groups work with governmentCommunity groups, including Urban and Rural Landcare, Park Care and Paddock Care, are continuing to make a significant contribution to weed control in the ACT. In 2002, the Friends of Mt Taylor recorded removal of the 40,000th weed from the reserve (Environment ACT 2002). In collaboration with the ACT Parks and Conservation Service, Park Care groups have been carrying out work in Canberra Nature Park, the Murrumbidgee River Corridor, Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve, Googong Foreshores, and Namadgi National Park (at Gudgenby). The groups anticipate active involvement in weed control as part of the recovery following the 2003 bushfire. Within a few months of the fire, regrowth of weed species was evident – Paterson’s Curse on Cooleman Ridge and Urambi Hills and Blackberry, African Love Grass and Serrated Tussock in the Murrumbidgee River Corridor (Environment ACT 2003). Weed control activities in the ACT are reported in the annual program reports and complete information can be found at . Weed management plans readyTen year (2002–12) weed management plans for the ACT have been completed for both declared pest plants in the ACT and other weed species. They are:
Other initiativesWeed Swap days were organised in October 2001 and April 2002. On these days, members of the public swapped woody weeds removed from their gardens with non-invasive native species. This was repeated in October 2002 (1236 plants swapped) and April 2003 (1197 plants swapped). The events were organised by the Australian Native Plants Society in conjunction with Environment ACT, and were supported by funding from the Natural Heritage Trust. Local nurseries now bush friendlyAll local nurseries have agreed to be ‘bush friendly’ by not selling any of the plants shown in a colour brochure, Are Your Garden Plants Going Bush?, produced by the ACT Weeds Working Group. The decision by nurseries follows visits in 2001–02 by the Conservation Council weeds officer (supported by the ACT Government). The ACT ‘Bush Friendly Nursery’ scheme aims to eliminate known and potential problem species from nurseries through education and awareness. Promotion of particular plants and sales by nurseries can contribute to existing and potential pest plants securing a greater foothold (Low 2001). While ACT legislation provides for declaration of pest plants and requires that a plan to control their propagation be prepared, there is no legislation to prohibit sale of declared pest plants. Many weed species in the ACT region originated from gardens, ponds and aquariums. However, checks of nurseries show that problem species, such as various forms of Broom, are sometimes still stocked. Not all nurseries display the ‘Bush Friendly Nursery’ sign and greater publicity of the scheme and its commercial advantage may be needed to encourage increased compliance and willingness to display the sign. Declared pest plantsTwenty-four species (or groups of species) have been declared as ‘pest plants’ since the Declaration of Pest Plants Instrument was made in June 1999 under the Land (Planning and Environment) Act 1991 (see Table 1). Of these, Cotoneasters, Broom, African Love Grass, Privets, Serrated Tussock, Chilean Needle Grass, Firethorns, Blackberry, Willows, Gorse and Noogoora Burr occur in the ACT. For the other listings, seven are water-weeds most of which are widely used in aquaria and have potential to spread into the ACT, and six are terrestrial species which do not currently occur or have been found only occasionally in the ACT. These listings reflect the serious problems these species have created elsewhere in Australia and the need to be proactive in preventing their introduction into the ACT.
Other weeds of concernThe Weeds Working Group has identified a broad range of other weeds that need attention, even though they have not been declared as 'pest plants'. Some of these are the focus of specific eradication or control programs, or are included in more general programs on roadsides, in conservation reserves or urban open space (see Tables 2 and 3).
Source: Environment ACT
Source: ACT Weeds Working Group Sleeper weedsAs well as the established and known pest plants, many of the introduced plants already in Australia may become weeds given sufficient time or a favourable change in conditions (Low 2001; Williams et al. 2001). These are termed 'sleeper' weeds. Two ecological factors useful in predicting sleeper weeds are time from naturalisation and relocation to a more favourable site as may occur, for example, during floods (Groves 1999). Berry and Mulvaney (1995) assessed the weed potential of a wide range of species found in the ACT, including those that had a restricted distribution but a moderate or high weed potential. They recommended that these species be a high priority for targeted control programs with a ‘hit team’ formed to locate and eradicate them. Such a team operated during 1998–2000 and focused its efforts on urban open space and areas adjoining conservation reserves. Data sources and referencesACT Weeds Working Group, Are Your Garden Plants Going Bush?, . Australian State of the Environment Committee 2001, Australia State of the Environment 2001, CSIRO publishing on behalf of the Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra. Berry, S & Mulvaney, M 1995, An Environmental Weed Survey of the Australian Capital Territory A report prepared for the Conservation Council of the South-East Region and Canberra, Conservation Council, Canberra. Cremer, K 1999, ‘Willow management for Australian rivers’, Natural Resource Management, (Special Issue) December 1999, pp. 2–22. Environment ACT 2002, The Scribbly Gum Park Care Annual Report 2001–2002, Environment ACT, Canberra. Environment ACT 2003, The Scribbly Gum Autumn 2003, Environment ACT, Canberra. Groves, R 1999. ‘Sleeper weeds’, in Proceedings of the 12th Australian Weeds conference, Tasmanian Weed Society, eds AC Bishop, M Boersma and CD Barnes Hobart, Tasmania, pp. 632–6. Lang, S 1999, ACT Willow Survey, unpublished, Environment ACT, Canberra. Low, T 2001, Feral Future: the untold story of Australia’s exotic invaders, Penguin, Ringwood, Victoria. Parsons, WT & Cuthbertson, EG 1992, Noxious Weeds of Australia, Inkata Press, Melbourne. Sainty, GR 7 Jacobs, SWL 1994, Waterplants in Australia 3rd Ed., Sainty & Assoc, Darlinghurst. Williams, J, Read, C, Norton, A, Dovers, S, Burgman, M, Proctor, W & Anderson, H 2001, Biodiversity, Australia State of the Environment Report 2001 (Theme Report), CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Department and Environment and Heritage, Canberra. Note:Some of these references are cited in Table 1 |